Member-only story
Although I identify most closely with Libertarian principles, I’m starting to edge away from Libertarianism upon further reflection because the ideological role of the State appears untenable in practice.
The reason Libertarian ideology concerning the State’s role across broader contexts may “appear” viable is because of Pax America that is made possible by the power of the American Republic. The Republic itself is not a weak State, but rather an extremely powerful one, founded upon and adheres to many ideas in Libertarianism such as Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Ideas are not enough though, there must exist quality institutions and rule of law to practically implement those ideas, and this is where ideology is not enough and contradictory.
I take the view that the opposite of a powerful authoritarian State, that can impose its will to enslave and crush the individual, is not a “weak” State nor a “lack” of State but a powerful State with institutions based on principles that counter authoritarianism.
I will consider here what States are, and some practical contexts of how a weak State or lack of State are flawed ideas that don’t stand up to closer…
